From:
The Embarrassments of Empire
(The American Conservarvative) -- by David Bromwich --
From Egypt to Pakistan, February 2011 will be remembered as a month unusually full of the embarrassments of empire. Americans were enthralled by a spectacle of liberty in which we felt we should somehow be playing a part. Here were popular movements toward self-government, which might once have looked to the United States as an exemplar, springing up all across North Africa and the Middle East. Why did they not look up to us now?
The answer became clearer with every equivocal word of the Obama administration, and every false step it took in trying to manage the crisis. A person suffers embarrassment when something true about himself emerges in spite of reasonable efforts to conceal it. It is the same with nations. Sovereign nations are abstract entities, of course – they cannot have feelings as people do — but there are times when they would blush if they could...
We have supported a succession of military strongmen in Egypt going as far back as 1952, when the CIA judged Gamal Abdel Nasser a plausible bulwark against Communism. The U.S. gives Egypt $1.3 billion annually in aid (mostly military). Of all our clients, only Israel gets more, at $3 billion annually. The view in Washington has long been that those two nations will oversee “the neighborhood” on our behalf. That is why a nonviolent insurgency on the West Bank, if it should occur, would meet as baffled a response from Washington as the February days in Egypt. The embarrassment is part of the situation.
A fair surmise is that Obama was no less confusing in private than in public; that when he spoke to Mubarak, his words were muffled and decorous: “You must begin leaving, but I will never desert you” — something like that. The difference between Mubarak’s shakiness in his first televised speech to the country and his evident composure in his second speech may well be explained by a signal that he took for an assurance.
I will never desert you, one recalls, is the message that Barack Obama conveyed to Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson (when Obama was still a candidate); to the banks and financial firms (in February 2009); to Dick Cheney and the torture lawyers (in his National Archives Speech of May 2009); to General David Petraeus (in the months preceding the 2009 administration review of the Afghan War); to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu via the Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak (in the summer of 2009); and to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (in February 2011).
The need to give assurance seems to be an inseparable trait of Obama’s character. He deals with big decisions by first moving to cement a secure alliance with the powers-that-be, no matter how discredited they are, no matter how resounding his previous contempt for them may have been. Yet this is a reflex that often prematurely cedes control to the powerful over whom he might otherwise be in a position to exert leverage. That fight, however, is not for him.
To say it another way, Obama visibly hates crisis. He is so averse to the very idea of instability that he seems unable to use a crisis to his advantage. Seldom, to judge by the evidence thus far, is he the first, second, or third person in the room to recognize that a state of crisis exists. The hesitation that looked like apathy and the hyper-managerial tone of his response to the BP oil spill offered a vivid illustration of this trait. Egypt brought out the same pattern...
If American officials looking at Egypt felt themselves “cabined, cribbed, confined,” anyone who knew the history of our Middle East policy could see the immediate cause. There was also a mediate cause, so ubiquitous as to be easily forgotten. This was, of course, Israel and the constant presence of Israel in American politics. In the last three months alone, Sarah Palin made public plans for a trip to Israel, and the Christian Zionist Mike Huckabee said that the U.S. ought to “encourage the Israelis to build as much as they can and as rapidly as they can” on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem.
Nor has Barack Obama been indifferent to such pressures. In earlier years, he expressed unmistakable sympathy for the cause of Palestinian independence; but the story changed in 2008, as he entered the last leg of the race for president. In a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), in June of that year, Obama made an astonishing pledge with religious overtones: the American commitment to Israeli security was, he said, “sacrosanct.” On his way to the White House, Obama purged his advisorate of figures like Robert Malley and Zbigniew Brzezinski who were deemed unsuitable by the Israel lobby.
Then, in June 2009, he made his celebrated Cairo speech, with its message of hope and sympathy for the progress of a liberal Muslim society. There at Cairo University, Obama called for a halt both to Palestinian terror and the Israeli occupation. Soon after, Hillary Clinton reiterated the demand that Israel enforce a complete stop to the building of settlements, with no exceptions for “outposts” or “natural growth.”
Benjamin Netanyahu simply defied these grave utterances; and he soon found he could do so with impunity. By the end of that summer, Obama had been persuaded to let pass in quiet disapproval anything Israel chose to do. The mid-term elections were now drawing close; and Obama apparently judged it expedient to have his Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and family photographed on a visit to the Golan Heights...MORE...LINK
FOR LIBERTARIAN NATIONALISM: ANTI-CORPORATIST, ANTI-COMMUNIST, ANTI-GLOBALIST...PRO-SOVEREIGNTY, PRO-POPULIST, PRO-FREE ENTERPRISE
My Other Blog & Comments
News and Information Feed
-
-
NATO triples spy flights near Crimea – analysis13 minutes ago
-
-
-
-
Only baddie that’ll walk the line35 minutes ago
-
Conservapedia:User complaints39 minutes ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Как защитить растения от тли2 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CITIZEN OPEN THREAD — WEDNESDAY3 hours ago
-
-
-
Open Thread4 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Devolution of Zelensky6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Why Mitch McConnell Is One Sick F**k7 hours ago
-
-
Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/26/20237 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rethinking Survival Fishing10 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nato is weakening America11 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cool new mustache12 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Data Here Does Not LIE!15 hours ago
-
Biden Is In Big Trouble15 hours ago
-
-
Medvedev Says Russia is Ready for War with NATO15 hours ago
-
The Matter with Concrete, Part 215 hours ago
-
-
-
Tuesday, September 26, 202317 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Rethinking Survival Fishing19 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The How And Why Of Things21 hours ago
-
Inside Russia’s “digital transformation”22 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
Broken1 day ago
-
-
-
-
ANP_Blacklisted1 day ago
-
-
New Words For An Old Ceremony1 day ago
-
-
-
It All Makes Sense Now1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hardcore5 days ago
-
The Truth About Brand5 days ago
-
Ron Paul Has a New Book!!!1 week ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Media Say ... Gloom And Doom In China3 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
U.S. Openly Militarizes Space5 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
-
Will The Fed End Trump?1 month ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conversations With Cabbies3 months ago
-
-
-
-
Hegemon USA’s War on Truth-Telling4 months ago
-
Headline: Terrible Christianese5 months ago
-
10 People Murdered in New York City Last Week5 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tusli Gabbard And Rose McGowan11 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Man, Bear, Pig Event Coming1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What a Wonderful Stocking Stuffer!1 year ago
-
test1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
#273 – Marc Randolph2 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement2 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement2 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Farewell, for now2 years ago
-
-
Audio Book Lost Colony of Hatteras2 years ago
-
-
Cancel Yourself2 years ago
-
-
Hello world!2 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Non-Jewish Origins of Krav Maga3 years ago
-
-
-
Why the Marines are dumping their tanks3 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Voxiversity Live Stream5 years ago
-
-
Big Brother’s War on Cash5 years ago
-
-
-
-
By: Osamas Pajamas9 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Visionless Obama epitomizes defective, modern elites, who care only about wealth and power, and have no idea what America is supposed to stand for
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment