There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government
(Telegraph) -- Janet Daley --
...The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of "global agreements" reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion. Except in the United States, where it became a very contentious talking point, the US still holding firmly to the 18th-century idea that power should lie with the will of the people.
Nor was much consideration given to the logical conclusion of all this grandiose talk of global consensus as unquestionably desirable: if there was no popular choice about approving supranational "legally binding agreements", what would happen to dissenters who did not accept their premises (on climate change, for example) when there was no possibility of fleeing to another country in protest? Was this to be regarded as the emergence of world government? And would it have powers of policing and enforcement that would supersede the authority of elected national governments? In effect, this was the infamous "democratic deficit" of the European Union elevated on to a planetary scale. And if the EU model is anything to go by, then the agencies of global authority will involve vast tracts of power being handed to unelected officials. Forget the relatively petty irritations of Euro‑bureaucracy: welcome to the era of Earth-bureaucracy, when there will be literally nowhere to run.
But, you may say, however dire the political consequences, surely there is something in this obsession with global dilemmas. Economics is now based on a world market, and if the planet really is facing some sort of man-made climate crisis, then that too is a problem that transcends national boundaries. Surely, if our problems are universal the solutions must be as well.
Well, yes and no. Calling a problem "global" is meant to imply three different things: that it is the result of the actions of people in different countries; that those actions have impacted on the lives of everyone in the world; and that the remedy must involve pretty much identical responses or correctives to those actions. These are separate premises, any of which might be true without the rest of them necessarily being so. The banking crisis certainly had its roots in the international nature of finance, but the way it affected countries and peoples varied considerably according to the differences in their internal arrangements. Britain suffered particularly badly because of its addiction to public and private debt, whereas Australia escaped relatively unscathed.
That a problem is international in its roots does not necessarily imply that the solution must involve the hammering out of a uniform global prescription: in fact, given the differences in effects and consequences for individual countries, the attempt to do such hammering might be a huge waste of time and resources that could be put to better use devising national remedies. France and Germany seem to have pulled themselves out of recession over the past year (and the US may be about to do so) while Britain has not. These variations owe almost nothing to the pompous, overblown attempts to find global solutions: they are largely to do with individual countries, under the pressure of democratic accountability, doing what they decide is best for their own people...MORE...LINK
FOR LIBERTARIAN NATIONALISM: ANTI-CORPORATIST, ANTI-COMMUNIST, ANTI-GLOBALIST...PRO-SOVEREIGNTY, PRO-POPULIST, PRO-FREE ENTERPRISE
My Other Blog & Comments
News and Information Feed
-
You're welcome!6 minutes ago
-
-
Footsteps getting louder12 minutes ago
-
-
-
News Briefs – 09/27/202340 minutes ago
-
-
-
-
NATO triples spy flights near Crimea – analysis57 minutes ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CITIZEN OPEN THREAD — WEDNESDAY4 hours ago
-
-
-
Open Thread4 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Devolution of Zelensky6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Why Mitch McConnell Is One Sick F**k7 hours ago
-
-
Gates of Vienna News Feed 9/26/20237 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
U.S. Responsible for Coups Worldwide10 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Rethinking Survival Fishing11 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nato is weakening America11 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Data Here Does Not LIE!16 hours ago
-
Biden Is In Big Trouble16 hours ago
-
-
Medvedev Says Russia is Ready for War with NATO16 hours ago
-
The Matter with Concrete, Part 216 hours ago
-
-
-
Tuesday, September 26, 202317 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Rethinking Survival Fishing19 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The How And Why Of Things22 hours ago
-
Inside Russia’s “digital transformation”22 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Broken1 day ago
-
-
-
-
ANP_Blacklisted1 day ago
-
-
New Words For An Old Ceremony1 day ago
-
-
-
It All Makes Sense Now1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hardcore5 days ago
-
The Truth About Brand5 days ago
-
Ron Paul Has a New Book!!!1 week ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Media Say ... Gloom And Doom In China3 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
U.S. Openly Militarizes Space5 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
-
Will The Fed End Trump?1 month ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conversations With Cabbies3 months ago
-
-
-
-
Hegemon USA’s War on Truth-Telling4 months ago
-
Headline: Terrible Christianese5 months ago
-
10 People Murdered in New York City Last Week5 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tusli Gabbard And Rose McGowan11 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Man, Bear, Pig Event Coming1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What a Wonderful Stocking Stuffer!1 year ago
-
test1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
#273 – Marc Randolph2 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement2 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement2 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Farewell, for now2 years ago
-
-
Audio Book Lost Colony of Hatteras2 years ago
-
-
Cancel Yourself2 years ago
-
-
Hello world!2 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Non-Jewish Origins of Krav Maga3 years ago
-
-
-
Why the Marines are dumping their tanks3 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Voxiversity Live Stream5 years ago
-
-
Big Brother’s War on Cash5 years ago
-
-
-
-
By: Osamas Pajamas9 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Who ever granted our presumptuous leaders the right to enter into dangerous and grandiose "global agreements"?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment