From:
The Real Ron Paul on Marriage and Drugs
(The New American) -- by Jack Kerwick, Ph.D. --
As of late, Ron Paul has once again been the subject of relentless criticism courtesy of Republican Party pundits.
It is his positions on marriage, “recreational” drugs, and current American foreign policy that invite, not just his detractors’ objections, but their ridicule and even their wrath. In all fairness, it is Paul’s statements in the Republican presidential primary debates — a venue, it must be admitted, that is not readily accommodating of the impassioned Texas congressman’s rather unorthodox beliefs — to which his critics speak. However, given that Paul has authored several reader-friendly books in which he elaborates on his views, if the GOP talking heads were really interested in what he thought, it is reasonable to expect that they would turn to these works.
So, what does Paul think about the aforementioned topics?
Let’s take marriage first.
When asked during the New Hampshire debate whether he would support a Constitutional amendment explicitly defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, Paul replied in the negative. He then followed up by insisting that “government” shouldn’t have anything at all to do with this institution. For this claim, he was excoriated by the likes of Ann Coulter and Michael Medved who exclaimed that Paul’s position would result in an anarchic situation in which property settlements, benefits claims, and the like would be rendered impossible.
The hysteria with which Coulter and Medved responded to Paul is in keeping with the hysteria that we have come to expect from his Republican opponents. Still, so defective is their reasoning on this score that it is hard to shake the suspicion that it is, at least in part, a function of bad faith.
Paul is not alone among his colleagues and competitors in the primaries in speaking of “government” interchangeably with the federal government. In fact, all of the candidates have a tendency to do this. And considering that they are all running for the presidency, it is to be expected that this should be so. That it is the federal government’s relationship to the institution of marriage with which Paul is principally concerned is born out by the following considerations.
First, it is the office of the presidency on which he sets his sights.
Second, being the constitutionalist that he is, there can be no doubt that if Paul were president, he would discharge only that narrow set of obligations that the Constitution specifies for holders of office at the federal level. How the individual states decided to treat marriage or any other issue that falls beyond the federal government’s constitutionally delineated jurisdiction is a matter respecting which a President Paul would be indifferent.
Third, again, the issue under question is an amendment to the Constitution that would supply a formal definition of marriage. Since it was immediately upon informing us that he would not endorse this amendment that Paul asserted his wish to see government remove itself from the marriage business altogether, anyone with any sensitivity to the context of this exchange should be able to recognize that “the government” to which he refers is the federal government...MORE...LINK
FOR LIBERTARIAN NATIONALISM: ANTI-CORPORATIST, ANTI-COMMUNIST, ANTI-GLOBALIST...PRO-SOVEREIGNTY, PRO-POPULIST, PRO-FREE ENTERPRISE
My Other Blog & Comments
News and Information Feed
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The market crash that wasn’t, yet58 minutes ago
-
QQQE: 3 Reasons Why I Would Avoid This ETF59 minutes ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sleep1 hour ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Iran Says Donald Trump Is Disrespectful2 hours ago
-
-
Why Does Communism Win?2 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
Everyone Is a Target Now3 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Red light, green light4 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Big Beautiful Bankruptcy6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
News Briefs – 06/30/202510 hours ago
-
-
Change for the Better11 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 Mossad Agents Busted in Iran15 hours ago
-
-
Big Brother is Watching You18 hours ago
-
-
-
Imam of Bologna: Lega Members Are Satanic21 hours ago
-
-
-
Europe needs a Metternich23 hours ago
-
-
They Got Thrashed1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Letters, We Write Letters2 days ago
-
Belsen camp3 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The End Of Free Will4 days ago
-
-
-
Scott Horton, Iran War4 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Korean EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT1 week ago
-
-
Trump, the Fake “American”1 week ago
-
-
-
Get Back2 weeks ago
-
-
A World Without iPhones?3 weeks ago
-
-
-
Media Roots Radio1 month ago
-
Thursday, May 1, 20251 month ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TFeed Index 20245 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
Federal_Nanny_State8 months ago
-
-
-
-
Surviving this Hurricane Season11 months ago
-
Hello world!11 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Imagine Being This Desperate1 year ago
-
-
-
-
U.S. Openly Militarizes Space1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conversations With Cabbies2 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Man, Bear, Pig Event Coming3 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What a Wonderful Stocking Stuffer!3 years ago
-
test3 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
#273 – Marc Randolph3 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement3 years ago
-
My Farewell Announcement3 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Farewell, for now4 years ago
-
-
Audio Book Lost Colony of Hatteras4 years ago
-
-
Cancel Yourself4 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Non-Jewish Origins of Krav Maga4 years ago
-
-
Why the Marines are dumping their tanks5 years ago
-
-
-
-
The Socio-Sexual Hierarchy: ALPHA6 years ago
-
-
Home: A Recap7 years ago
-
Big Brother’s War on Cash7 years ago
-
-
-
-
By: Osamas Pajamas11 years ago
-
Form Post11 years ago
-
Join Our Mailing List13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment